Showing posts with label Geoff Ogilvy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Geoff Ogilvy. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

The Kitty and the Big Snake


+
=

"Hmmmmmmmmm,wondering if I'd hit that"




We had to know something was wrong when Cobra announced that they were "exiting the market for Tour level equipment" - as I wrote here when that was announced, something just did not smell right. Well, today the other shoe fell. Many reports had surfaced over the last several months that Puma was trying hard to get into the equipment business...and those reports have at last come true.
Puma announced today that it had reached agreement with Acushnet (parent company of Titleist, FootJoy, and Cobra) to acquire Cobra Golf. Acushnet bought Cobra for $700 MM in 1995, and Cobra reported sales of $200 MM in 2008. Using some middle of the road multiples on the deal, it's not likely that Acushnet made any real profit (especially considering they held onto it for 15 years...)

This deal raises some interesting questions relative to the players...
  • Cobra has a very respectable stable of young guns (Villegas,Poulter, and JB Holmes) ...I can't imagine that Titleist is anxious to lose their connection with them, as all of them have won within the last year.
  • Meanwhile, Puma's "face" on the Tour (Rickie Fowler) is a die hard Titleist loyalist from a hardware perspective (Driver,Irons,Wedges,Putter,Ball, Glove, etc). I will be curious to see if they apply any pressure to switch
  • Finally, Puma's previous "face" on Tour, Geoff Ogilvy, has just switched from Cobra to Titleist this year...and I can't help but think there are some bruised feelings somewhere in there.
  • Rumor has it that the Olsen twins somehow play into an outing with the next Cobra staff player to win. Somewhere, Camilo is smiling...
Anyway, I hope the deal is good for all involved. It's great to see an international brand like Puma enter the golf equipment business, as they will surely need deep pockets to play in that arena.

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Titleist is on a Small Roll...



Back in the day, one of my buds had a saying.... "I'm on a small roll". To the world, that meant "I managed to get a girl to talk to me more than once in a 72 hour period without slapping my face" - however, to Jim it meant " I am having a great deal of success with something that is my primary focus in life".
Well, based on the results thus far in 2010 on the PGA Tour, the folks at Titleist are "on a small roll"... Check This Out...

Event

Winner

Irons

Ball

Northern Trust Open

Stricker

Titleist 755

Pro V1

Farmer's Insurance Open

Crane

Titleist AP2

Pro V1x

Bob Hope Classic

Haas

Titleist CB Forged

Pro V1

Sony Open

Palmer

Titleist AP2

Pro V1

SBS Classic

Ogilvy

Titleist MB

Pro V1


No question, this is a pretty impressive showing. I've previously written about Titleist, and given them some grief for losing young players soon after they join the pro ranks (Danny Lee, etc.). However, in addition to the impressive list above, they have done a kick a$$ job in the last year snagging some real young guns....ponder this list:
  • Rory McIlroy
  • Rickie (Aerosmith) Fowler
  • Michael Sim
  • Nick Watney
They also migrated Geoff Ogilvy over from sister company Cobra (can Camilo,Ian, and JB be next ??). Hat's off to Titleist for keeping the pedal to the metal and setting the standard among the Tour players. Another thought provoking factoid:
- 2010 Results - 5 Winners, All played Titleist Irons and Balls
- 2nd half of 2009: 21 Winners, 4 played Titleist Irons, 9 Played Titleist Balls

For the Math nerds among us, that means that Titleist has improved their iron's success rate by more than 500%, and have ALREADY had more different Winners in 2010 than they had in all of 2009 ( 5 vs. 3). In addition, their ball success rate has improved by more than 2X.

Just curious about a couple of things...
(1) I wonder how long it will be until a ball made by anyone ELSE wins a 2010 event ? My guess... March.
(2) Could the new grooves have anything to do with Titleist's dominance thus far ? Are their balls performing better with the new grooves ? Are their "new grooves" somehow better ?
(3) Is this the Tiger effect ? (sorry, could not ignore that....)

And you thought Bushwood never did any real research....take THAT Waggleroom !